{"id":2991,"date":"2024-09-09T10:27:12","date_gmt":"2024-09-09T03:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/audithink.com\/?p=2991"},"modified":"2026-09-08T13:28:24","modified_gmt":"2026-09-08T06:28:24","slug":"audit-standards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/audithink.com\/en\/blog\/standar-audit\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding Audit Standards along with 3 Types and Their Qualifications"},"content":{"rendered":"

An auditing standard is an official guideline governing how an audit must be planned, carried out, and reported<\/strong>, so its results are consistent, objective, and accountable. This standard is set by a professional body, not by the auditor or the entity being audited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Indonesia there is no single auditing standard. The applicable standard depends on who is auditing and what is being audited: public accountants use the SA from IAPI, state financial examiners use the SPKN from BPK, government internal auditors use the SAIPI, while corporate internal auditors follow the IIA standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article discusses the auditing standards applicable in Indonesia, the classic three-type framework still widely taught, auditor qualifications, and their difference from audit procedure<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Important notes:<\/strong> Many references still present “10 auditing standards” grouped into 3 types \u2014 general standards, field work, and reporting. That framework comes from the old SPAP. Since IAPI adopted International Standards on Auditing<\/em>, financial statement audits in Indonesia refer to the Standard Audit (SA)<\/strong> organized by number, not by the three groups. This article presents both, with the old framework positioned as historical context still used in course materials.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Standart Audit Definition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

An auditing standard is a provision set by a professional body to ensure audits are carried out independently, objectively, and based on sufficient evidence. Its function is to equalize a minimum level of quality: whoever the auditor is, the work performed must meet the same threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Terms auditing standards<\/em> and audit standards<\/em> are often used interchangeably. Historically “auditing standards” referred to the old SPAP framework, while “Auditing Standards (SA)” is the official name of the standard currently applicable to public accountants in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Its authors differ by jurisdiction and audit type: the Indonesian Institute of Certified Public Accountants (IAPI) in Indonesia, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants<\/em> (AICPA) in the United States, as well as international bodies such as the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)<\/a> which oversees the development of international auditing standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auditing Standards Applicable in Indonesia<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question “how many auditing standards are there” has no single answer, because it depends on the engagement context. Here are the main standards applicable in Indonesia along with their scope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Standards<\/th>Issuing Body<\/th>Used for<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
SA (Auditing Standards)<\/strong>, part of SPAP<\/td>IAPI<\/td>Financial statement audits by public accountants. Adopted from International Standards on Auditing<\/em> and organized by number, for example SA 200 on the auditor's overall objectives and SA 315 on risk assessment.<\/td><\/tr>
SPKN<\/strong> (State Financial Examination Standards)<\/td>BPK<\/td>Examination of state financial management and accountability, covering financial, performance, and specific-purpose examinations.<\/td><\/tr>
SAIPI<\/strong> (Indonesian Government Internal Audit Standards)<\/td>AAIPI<\/td>Internal audit carried out by government internal control apparatus (APIP) at ministries, agencies, and local governments.<\/td><\/tr>
Global Internal Audit Standards<\/strong><\/td>The IIA<\/td>Corporate internal audit. Effective since January 2025, replacing the previous IPPF framework, and serves as the general reference for internal audit functions at companies and state-owned enterprises.<\/td><\/tr>
ISO 19011<\/strong><\/td>ISO<\/td>Guidance for management system audits, such as ISO 9001 quality audits or environmental management system audits.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The practical consequences matter. An internal auditor at a state-owned enterprise is not bound by the SA that applies to public accountants, but by internal audit standards \u2014 and if that enterprise is also examined by BPK, that examination uses the SPKN. Equating the three is a common mistake.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See also:<\/strong> Internal Audit Standards in Indonesia and Guidelines for Their Implementation<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

3 Types of Auditing Standards (Classic Framework)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"illustration
From: AMT IT Solutions<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The classic framework divides auditing standards into three groups: general standards, field work standards, and reporting standards. Although already superseded by the SA in public accountant practice, this framework remains useful as a concept map because the three follow the audit flow: the auditor's requirements, how the work is done, then how it is reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. General Standard (General Standards<\/em>)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

General standards govern the requirements attached to the auditor personally before and during the audit, focusing on professional competence, ethics, and personal qualifications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Independency<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The auditor must be independent both in mental attitude and in appearance. This means the auditor must not have a financial, personal, or business relationship with the audited entity that could affect their professional objectivity and integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Professional Competency<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The auditor must have adequate knowledge, skills, and experience, including an understanding of accounting principles, auditing standards, and practices applicable in the audited entity's industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Due Professional Care<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The auditor must work with professional care and diligence at every stage of the audit, from planning to reporting, including maintaining professional skepticism toward the evidence obtained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Field Work Standards (Fieldwork Standards<\/em>)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Field work standards govern how the audit is carried out: planning, understanding of the entity, and gathering evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Planning and Supervision<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The audit must be adequately planned and the work of assistants must be properly supervised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Understanding the Audited Entity<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The auditor must understand the business environment and internal control<\/a> of the entity in order to plan the nature, timing, and extent of testing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Audit Evidence<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The auditor must obtain audit evidence<\/a><\/strong> that is sufficient and appropriate as the basis for expressing an opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Standard Reporting (Reporting Standards<\/em>)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Reporting standards govern the preparation and delivery of the audit report<\/a><\/strong> so that its information is clear, accurate, and reliable for its users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conformity with Accounting Principles<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The report must state whether the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consistency<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The report must disclose if the accounting principles used are not consistent with the prior period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pengungkapan<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Disclosures in the financial statements are considered adequate unless stated otherwise in the auditor's report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auditor Opinion<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The report must contain a statement of audit opinion<\/a><\/strong> on the financial statements as a whole, or a statement that an opinion cannot be given along with the reasons.<\/p>\n\n\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"cta\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n\n\n\n

Auditor's Qualifications<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

General standards demand certain qualifications of the auditor personally. Here are the qualifications generally required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Education<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Auditors generally have a background in accounting or finance education, with most professional auditors holding an accounting degree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Professional Certification<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In Indonesia, public accountants must hold a license as a Public Accountant and generally hold a CPA certificate. For internal auditors, the common certification is Certified Internal Auditor<\/em> (CIA) or Qualified Internal Auditor (QIA).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Job Experience<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Experience determines the auditor's ability to recognize patterns of irregularity. The auditor needs to understand the characteristics of various industries and entity types.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Analitical Ability<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The auditor must be able to evaluate financial data, read trends, and identify anomalies indicating potential errors or irregularities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Professional Ethics<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Integrity, independence, objectivity, and confidentiality are ethical demands attached to the auditing profession and governed by the profession's code of ethics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Difference Between Auditing Standards and Audit Procedures<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Both are equally important but operate at different levels. Standards answer “how well must the audit be carried out”, while procedures answer “what is done today”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aspect<\/th>Audit Standards<\/th>Audit Procedure<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Properties<\/strong><\/td>Normative, binding<\/td>Practical, operational<\/td><\/tr>
Issuing Body<\/strong><\/td>Professional body<\/td>Auditor or audit team<\/td><\/tr>
Flexibility<\/strong><\/td>Fixed, applies to all engagements<\/td>Tailored to the entity and audit objective<\/td><\/tr>
Example of<\/strong><\/td>The auditor must obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence<\/td>Confirming receivable balances with the 30 largest customers<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Provisions Of Internal Audit Standards<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Internal audit has its own provisions, separate from financial statement auditing standards. Here are the main points of those provisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Independency<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Internal auditors must be independent both organizationally and individually, free from interference by any party within the organization that could affect their judgment. Organizational independence is generally achieved through a direct reporting line to the audit committee or board of commissioners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Competency<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Internal auditors must have adequate knowledge, skills, and experience, and are required to maintain them through continuing professional education.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Audit Planning<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Each engagement must be planned by setting objectives, scope, methodology, and resource allocation. Planning must take into account risks<\/a><\/strong> and the existing internal controls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Audit Execution<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The audit is carried out according to plan by gathering sufficient and relevant evidence to support each finding and recommendation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Audit Reporting<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The report includes an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control, risk management, and organizational governance, and is delivered to the appropriate parties such as management, the board of directors, or the audit committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Evaluation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Internal auditors monitor management's follow-up on audit recommendations and report the results of that monitoring to the appropriate parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

FAQ About Auditing Standards<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
What is an auditing standard?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

An auditing standard is an official guideline governing how an audit must be planned, carried out, and reported so its results are consistent, objective, and accountable. This standard is set by a professional body, not by the auditor or the entity being audited.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

How many auditing standards are there?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

There is no single number, because it depends on context. The classic framework divides them into 3 groups: general standards, field work, and reporting. Meanwhile, the Auditing Standards (SA) applicable to public accountants in Indonesia are organized by number, not by group.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

What auditing standards apply in Indonesia?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

It depends on the type of audit: SA<\/strong> from IAPI for financial statement audits by public accountants, SPKN<\/strong> from BPK for state financial examinations, SAIPI<\/strong> from AAIPI for government internal audit, IIA standards for corporate internal audit, and ISO 19011<\/strong> for management system audits.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

What is the difference between auditing standards and audit standards?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

The two are often used interchangeably. Historically “auditing standards” referred to the old SPAP framework with ten standards in three groups, while “Auditing Standards (SA)” is the official name of the standard currently applicable to public accountants in Indonesia.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Who sets auditing standards?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

A professional body. In Indonesia, the Indonesian Institute of Certified Public Accountants (IAPI) sets the SA, BPK sets the SPKN, and AAIPI sets the SAIPI. At the international level there is IFAC, which oversees the development of auditing standards, as well as AICPA in the United States.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

What types of auditing standards exist in the classic framework?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

Three groups: general standards<\/strong> (independence, professional competence, due professional care<\/em>), fieldwork standards<\/strong> (planning and supervision, understanding of the entity, audit evidence), and reporting standards<\/strong> (conformity with accounting principles, consistency, disclosure, auditor's opinion).<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

What is the difference between auditing standards and audit procedures?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

Auditing standards are normative and binding on every engagement \u2014 a professional body's guideline on how well an audit must be carried out. Audit procedures are practical and operational: concrete steps for gathering evidence, tailored to the entity and the audit objective.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

What qualifications must an auditor have?<\/strong><\/summary>\n

A background in accounting or finance education, professional certification (CPA for public accountants, CIA or QIA for internal auditors), work experience in audit, analytical skills, and professional integrity and ethics.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

Read also \u2014 compliance, legal, and quality audit:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n